Pursuing a
bachelor’s degree was not only academically challenging, but also challenging
in terms of maintaining social relationships. While many of my conflicts
revolved around roommates, more complex disputes occurred during group
assignments. Since my past university mainly focused on aviation and aerospace,
one challenge I constantly faced were the “language” and information used in
group projects. Unlike most students, I was in the minority group that
studied general business administration. Whether I was in a simple
math or management course, aviation and aerospace related terminology were
often used, which caused a lot of confusion and conflicts.
I got into
a very unfortunate situation one year where a course titled “Airport
Management” was the only elective course available during my last two terms
before graduation. The course was mainly designed for students studying aviation business
administration: the other version of my field of study. Due to the aviation
focus (and many students prefer this degree program), many of my classmates
were familiar with their aviation-related terminologies. Some of the students
were also pilots.
During the
last few weeks of class, my professor assigned us a group project where we
analyzed a real-life airport's operations. The group that I was randomly
assigned to were all pilots. As a result, I was often confused by their
unfamiliar vocabulary and data. Due to my lack of knowledge, I constantly asked
for clarification. Over time, my constant habit of asking annoyed my team
members: causing them to ignore or refuse my ideas. The conflict got worse
after I received an email from my professor: where someone in the group made a
complaint on my work effort. After providing some clarifications and other
information to the professor, I decided that it was time to talk directly to my
team members.
Since my
group members often ignored or halted me from talking, it was very complicated
to start the negotiation process. Wanting to avoid making the situation worse,
I approached them slowly and kindly asked if I can have a quick word with
everyone. Surprisingly, my group members stopped and paid attention. After
informing them that I was not a pilot or in the aviation business field, they
were shocked and became very apologetic. In the end, the group and I were able
to sort and work things out.
For this
conflict, it was clear that informational deficiency was the primary issue.
None of my group members were aware that I was a pilot or in the aviation
business administration program. As Whetten and Cameron stated, it is important
to clarify the areas that are being misunderstood to resolve conflict (2016).
In addition, I believe that I was able to resolve this conflict by approaching
them calmly and having something in common.
McDonald
and Messinger states that people often responds back the way they were
approached (n.d.). For this case, I didn't want any further anger, yelling,
etc. to occur, so I knew that it was important to approach them with kindness.
To do this, I maintained calm tone and expressions. Just like William Ury's
ideas, I was likely able to resolve the conflict by finding a common ground.
Despite having different fields of study, we all had something in common:
finishing the project. By informing my care of the project, the group was able
to realize that I was not trying to avoid doing my portion(s) of the project,
and was willing to cooperate (some believed that I was making the group do my
work).
In summary,
I was able to resolve conflict by informing my group about my situation. Due to
the lack of information at the start of the project, my group ended up making
assumptions that ultimately caused confusion to the group. If I were to face a
similar in the future, I should have acted faster and identified the situation
and inform my group before further complications occur.
References:
McDonald, N., & Messinger, D., (n.d.), The Development of Empathy: How, When, and Why. Retrieved from http://www.psy.miami.edu/faculty/dmessinger/c_c/rsrcs/rdgs/emot/McDonald-Messinger_Empathy%20Development.pdf
Ury, W. (2010). Willaim Ury: The walk from no to yes. TED. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/william_ury/transcript?language=en
Whetten, D. A., & Cameron, K. S. (2016). Developing management skills. Boston: Pearson Education.
References:
McDonald, N., & Messinger, D., (n.d.), The Development of Empathy: How, When, and Why. Retrieved from http://www.psy.miami.edu/faculty/dmessinger/c_c/rsrcs/rdgs/emot/McDonald-Messinger_Empathy%20Development.pdf
Ury, W. (2010). Willaim Ury: The walk from no to yes. TED. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/william_ury/transcript?language=en
Whetten, D. A., & Cameron, K. S. (2016). Developing management skills. Boston: Pearson Education.
No comments:
Post a Comment